Same outcome.
No $1M invoice.
Accenture, IBM, Deloitte, Capgemini, TCS, and Infosys all offer cloud migration engagements. They charge $250–500/hr per consultant and routinely deliver 12–36 month projects with change orders built into the model. QuickCloud delivers the same technical outcomes — automated code refactoring, database migration, identity migration, security hardening, cost governance, and QA validation — for $143,988/yr with no change orders possible.
The Cost Comparison Is Not Close
- $250–500/hr per consultant × multiple headcount
- 12–36 month engagement timeline
- Change orders add 30–80% above the original SOW
- Ongoing support contract required after cutover
- Knowledge leaves with the consultants
- Fixed annual subscription. No change orders.
- All 7 products included: Migration, Database, Identity, Security & Cost Intelligence, QA, Perf
- First migration run in 4 hours from activation
- Platform stays with your team after migration
- Security, cost, and QA tools run continuously post-migration
A single consulting engagement at the low end of market rates ($500K) equals over 5 years of QuickCloud Platform access.
Seen enough?
Schedule a walk-through.
No consulting invoice. No change orders. Ever.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
A direct comparison across the dimensions that matter most to procurement teams and technical leads evaluating migration options.
| Dimension | QuickCloud Platform | Accenture / IBM / Deloitte / Capgemini / TCS / Infosys |
|---|---|---|
| Typical cost | $143,988/yr flat (all 7 products) | $250–500/hr per consultant. Full engagement: $500K–$2M+, often with change orders. |
| Time to first migration run | Hours from activation — first migration run same day. | 3–6 months of scoping, staffing, and discovery before any code moves. |
| Total project timeline | Weeks to months depending on scope | 12–36 months. Budget overruns and schedule extensions are endemic. |
| Control & IP ownership | Your team runs every phase. Automation, playbooks, and outputs stay with you. | Knowledge lives inside the consulting team. When the engagement ends, your team has no tooling. |
| Repeatability | Automated pipelines run on every migration. Reusable across future programs. | Work is bespoke to each engagement. Nothing is portable to your next project. |
| Validation & audit evidence | Parallel-run comparison with output diffs at every phase gate. Auditor-ready evidence packages. | Manual spot-checking or proprietary internal tools. Audit evidence is ad hoc. |
| Pricing risk | Fixed annual subscription. No change orders possible. | Change orders are standard. Scope creep routinely adds 30–80% to the original contract. |
| Post-migration coverage | Security monitoring, cloud cost governance, and QA testing keep running after migration. | Consultants leave at project close. Ongoing operations are your problem. |
| AI & source code security | AI analysis routed through a tenant-isolated gateway. Your COBOL never hits an external API directly. | Many firms route code to third-party AI tools (GitHub Copilot, OpenAI APIs) without contractual isolation. |
| Deep legacy platform coverage | z/OS, AS/400, HP NonStop, Unisys, NATURAL/ADABAS, RPG, 165+ asset types. | Varies by practice. Most large SIs sub-contract specialty platforms to boutique shops. |
What Consulting Firms Don't Tell You
This isn't a criticism of individual consultants — most are talented engineers. It's an honest look at the structural incentives of the consulting engagement model.
Change orders are not exceptions — they are the business model.
Large consulting firms price discovery engagements deliberately lean. The real revenue comes from change orders when requirements expand, timelines slip, or new risks surface. A $600K SOW routinely becomes a $1.1M engagement by month nine. QuickCloud is a fixed-price subscription. There is no mechanism for a change order.
When the consultants leave, so does the knowledge.
After an 18-month engagement, your internal team inherits an environment they did not build, using patterns they did not create, with documentation written by people no longer on the contract. QuickCloud keeps your engineers in the driver seat throughout — they learn the platform, own the process, and retain full institutional knowledge.
Consulting engagements produce deliverables, not repeatable tooling.
A migration engagement produces a migrated system. It does not produce a migration platform. If you need to migrate a second application next year, you start a new engagement and pay again. QuickCloud is a subscription platform — every tool, playbook, and automation you use on the first migration is available on the second, third, and tenth.
Your COBOL source code may be leaving your network without your knowledge.
Several large SIs now use AI-assisted code analysis tools as part of their standard methodology. What is less publicized is where that AI analysis runs. If your consultant is using a shared SaaS code-analysis platform, your COBOL — including business logic, customer data flows, and compliance-sensitive routines — is being processed outside your network perimeter. QuickCloud routes all AI analysis through a dedicated, tenant-isolated gateway. Your source code never leaves your environment directly.
Manual validation is not the same as compliance evidence.
Consultants validate migrations through code review, UAT sessions, and manual testing scripts. These produce sign-off documents, not audit evidence. When your SOX auditors ask for before/after output comparisons at every phase gate, a PDF of meeting notes from a UAT workshop does not satisfy the request. QuickCloud generates machine-readable diff reports at every phase boundary — output that is structured, traceable, and defensible.
When You Should Still Consider a Consulting Firm
We believe in honest comparisons. There are scenarios where large SIs add genuine value that a software platform cannot replicate.
Genuinely suitable for large SIs:
- Highly politicized organizational transformations where an external authority provides cover for difficult decisions
- Multi-year programs that require dedicated project management office (PMO) resources your internal team cannot absorb
- Heavily regulated environments (e.g., federal banking regulators, FDA) where a named advisory firm is expected by the regulator
- Organizations with no internal engineering team — where the consulting firm is genuinely executing the work, not advising on it
Better handled by QuickCloud:
- All technical execution — code refactoring, schema migration, identity migration, parallel-run validation
- Automated compliance evidence generation throughout the migration lifecycle
- Post-migration operations: security posture monitoring, cost governance, regression testing
- Future migrations — the platform stays, so repeat work costs nothing extra
The hybrid approach: Many of our customers use a lean consulting team for program governance and stakeholder management while QuickCloud handles all technical execution. This typically costs 60–70% less than a full consulting engagement while delivering faster, more reliable technical outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions from procurement teams evaluating QuickCloud against consulting alternatives.
Your next step is a walk-through, not a six-month scoping engagement.
Schedule a walk-through today. We'll run analysis against your actual source code and show you exactly how QuickCloud handles your migration — no multi-year engagement required, no change orders possible.
Platform plan: $143,988/yr · All 7 products · No change orders · Predictable SaaS pricing
For Consulting Firms
Are You a Delivery Partner?
Many consulting firms and SIs use QuickCloud as their delivery platform — handling 3× more migrations with the same team, at higher margins. The Partner Program includes discounted licensing, deal registration, white-label Demo Studio, and a dedicated success channel.
View the Partner Program →